5 Comments
User's avatar
Michael Spencer's avatar

It sounds like we're going to be throwing a lot of capital at trying to create AI a body. But is this something people really want or need is one of those questions.

The Bootstrapper's avatar

The question is always where the value will consolidate. Nice article…would love a deep dive in software in robotics, VLAs and different approaches towards this (e.g. emergences)

Michael Spencer's avatar

Now if you did this for Space-technology I'd REALLY be interested too.

Rafayel Ghasabyan's avatar

Amazing article! It offers a fascinating perspective and categorization.

While I have several questions about the rationale behind the segmentation, I thoroughly enjoyed reading it and comparing it to our internal research and forecasts from the past year or two. The primary question that arises is: why does the author believe Laboratory Automation deserves its own segment, while "field robotics" is not prominently featured as a separate category?

Additionally, I wonder if there’s a breakdown into separate industries, and why I can’t see agriculture, construction, or defense-related robots within this segmentation. Where do these robots fit in the current categorization?

Ahmed Eshashe's avatar

Very informative article.

Now we can finally see the snowball starting to take momentum